Numerous distinguished Bitcoin specialists, together with Adam Again, Jimmy Track and Andreas Antonopoulos, have raised some considerations over the implementation of restrictive covenants, particularly with the BIP119.
Particularly, Antonopoulos has voiced considerations over “recursive covenants” that the brand new replace may convey, thereby deteriorating the community. A recursive covenant happens when a programmer restricts a transaction, however he does it in a manner that restricts one other transaction after that, beginning a domino impact leading to future limitless recursive covenants.
Blacklisting and dangers of censorship and confiscation
Whereas locking up the place a Bitcoin will be spent is advantageous to make sure extra safety, it additionally offers grounds for censorship, and management by governments, which might hinder the very existence of Bitcoin. Authorities may probably pressure exchanges to withdraw solely to covenants with some management over the coin.
Whereas this identical danger already exists, since governments can ask exchanges to ship solely to addresses with a taproot spend path or multi-sig managed by them, may the implementation of covenants facilitate malicious functions the place it might make it simpler for governments to implement a kind of on-chain KYC?
Fungibility threats
Covenants may intrude with Bitcoin’s fungibility — the power of every Bitcoin to be an identical in operate and high quality.
Whereas helpful for safety and scalability, covenants would change the properties of particular Bitcoin items, basically creating various kinds of digital forex, distinct in response to what could possibly be spent or the place it could possibly be despatched.
Because of this, those that oppose the change argued that limiting how one can spend your Bitcoin would in the end restrict Bitcoin’s use as a digital forex, with inevitable penalties in its worth.
There are sturdy opinions on covenants’ professionals and cons; nonetheless, debates are wholesome and crucial to enhance a decentralized and leaderless community. Finally, the ultimate resolution shall be right down to the customers and node operators who will obtain the software program that higher displays their viewpoint.